Comparative Criminal 6 Ass

© 2021 Post University, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

CRJ402 – Comparative Criminal Justice

Unit 6 Assignment Forum: China’s Dual Policing System

Due Dates:

• By Friday of Unit 6, 11:59 p.m. EST – Post assignment to the forum. • By Sunday of Unit 6, 11:59 p.m. EST – Respond to a classmate.

Points: 100 Overview: In this assignment forum, you will create a presentation that exhibits what you have learned about the dual policing system of China and share it with the class. Instructions: China has two kinds of justice systems that are designed to complement one another. One is the formal system that the government established. The other system is informal in that it is essentially part of the country’s cultural tradition, and its roots can be traced back to ancient times. Although the government did not create the informal system, it influences and controls how it operates today. The informal system is reflected in communities taking an active role in assuring that social order is maintained locally and in citizens resolving disputes through mediation rather than relying on courts. Using whatever tool you’d like (PowerPoint, Word, Prezi, video, etc.), design a presentation that includes the following information:

• The details and structure of the Chinese dual policing system.

• Benefits vs. challenges of this type of system.

• How does this system address the issues in China’s criminal justice system?

Respond to at least one (1) classmate’s assignment with the following:

• Discuss something new you have learned from their presentation. • Be sure to elaborate on your classmate’s ideas with further comment or observation, present a

relevant new idea or viewpoint for consideration, and raise a question or politely offer an alternative perspective.

 

 

© 2021 Post University, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Requirements:

• Use at least two (2) scholarly resources and include reference citations in correct APA formatting.

• Post the assignment and your response by the due dates listed above.

Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before you write and again after you write.

 

 

© 2021 Post University, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Evaluation Rubric for China’s Dual Policing System Assignment

CRITERIA Deficient Development Needed Satisfactory Proficient

Details and Structure

(0-14 Points) (15-19 Points) (20-22 Points) (23-25 Points)

Component is minimally or not addressed.

Component is somewhat addressed.

Component is fairly well addressed.

Component is thoroughly addressed.

Benefits vs. Challenges

(0-14 Points) (15-19 Points) (20-22 Points) (23-25 Points)

Component is minimally or not addressed.

Component is somewhat addressed.

Component is fairly well addressed.

Component is thoroughly addressed.

Addresses Issues in China’s Criminal Justice System

(0-14 Points) (15-19 Points) (20-22 Points) (23-25 Points)

Component is minimally or not addressed.

Component is somewhat addressed.

Component is fairly well addressed.

Component is thoroughly addressed.

References and APA Formatting

(0-2 Points) (3 Points) (4 Points) (5 Points)

Reference citations are not present, or APA style formatting has significant errors.

Some citations are missing, and/or citations have some issues with APA style formatting.

All references are cited, but citations have minor errors in APA style formatting.

Reference citations are included and correctly formatted in APA style.

Peer Response

(0 Points) (5 Points) (8 Points) (10 Points)

No response post made to a classmate’s presentation.

Peer response provided though minimal and lacking depth by restating or summarizing what was already expressed; details and new ideas missing or lacking.

Peer response elaborates on classmate’s ideas with further comment, including discussion of the topics but does not raise a question or offer an alternative perspective.

Peer response elaborates on classmate’s ideas with further comment including discussion of the topics; presents a relevant new idea or viewpoint for consideration; raises a question or politely offers an alternative perspective.

Posting Due Dates (0 Points) (5 Points) (10 Points)

The assignment and response were not posted by the due dates of the unit.

Either the assignment or the response was not posted by the due date of the unit.

Both the assignment and response were posted by the due dates of the unit.